Thispaper will require youto complete an in-depth review of an existinggovernmentpartnership in a field ofpersonalinterest.Please select one of the options below:Option A – Explore the nature of a...

Running Head: PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP     1
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP         2
MANAGING GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIPS
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Organisation    3
Sector review    5
Partnership design, implementation and evaluation    10
Conclusion    12
References    13
Introduction
Public private partnership is a mode of providing the public infrastructure and services by the government in collaboration with the private sector. The partnership is formed for the development of the society. Infrastructure requires heavy investment that may not be possible for the private sector alone.
On the other hand, the private organisations are believed to be more efficient over government-controlled enterprise. Due to the emergence of concept of public private partnership, the public administrators are able to concentrate on the activities involving planning, regulation and policy. The private organisation is empowered to execute the plan in the best manner possible.
This assignment deals with Infrastructure Partnership Australia that is an independent body. It has its own polices and network that is focused on the development of infrastructure for the benefits of the society. This organisation was launched in the year 2005. A year after in 2006, the Australian Council for Infrastructure Development amalgamated with Infrastructure Partnership Australia.
The organisation manages the key infrastructural issues in Australia that includes electricity network, road user charging, transport, social infrastructure and others. The chairperson of the group is Adrian Kloeden and the Chief Executive is Adrian Dwyer.
Organisation
The Mo
is Lemma and John Brumby established the organisation in the year 2005. It aspires to inform the public policy debate around solutions to Australia’s infrastructural challenges. It predicts and shows data that help in framing effective policies for the development of the infrastructure of the society.
According to the opinion of Faso (2016), a number of research organisations have collaborated with the organisation in the recent years to ensure that the bets research data can be framed. It is composed of Australian Infrastructure metric in construction, transport, mining, utilities and other infrastructural industries. It generates variety of dynamic graphs for better presentation of the data (Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, 2016).
It is a major and long-term research initiative that has been produced in collaboration with the BIS Oxford Economics. The metric captures around 30% of the construction activity each quarter. The data is used to plan the activities for the future quarters. The Australian Infrastructure metric is one of the leading indicators of the direction and strength of the civil construction sector in the whole of Australia. Twenty largest civil contractors participate in the quarterly study of the organisation.
A substantial sample of the work won by each companies per quarter is measured. The data for each individual companies is consolidated to find the total work won for the quarter. The actual data is then compared with the planed data to identify the shortfalls. As per the views of Cruz and da Cruz (2017), the metric also captures the trend, progress and other relevant data of the contractors over a period.
The website of the organisation displays the full metric report to ensure transparency of data. The data can be viewed by any individual interest in knowing about the infrastructure progress of the country. The reports of different quarter indicate different state of infrastructural development depending upon the progress. The data for the September quarter indicates that the progress of the civil construction work was less in comparison to the figures of the previous quarter.
The decrease was due to a drop in the construction activities relate to the non-mining and mining sectors. The progress of the transport sector was higher over the last year. This indicates the rapid progress of the transportation sector. Railway investment also observed a healthy spike in the June quarter (Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, 2016).
Sector review
There was a significant development of the transportation sector in comparison to the previous year. A healthy increase in investment was also observed in the railway sector. This indicates that the opportunities in the railway and transportation sector are higher than that in the civil sector or others. According to the perspective of Osei-Kyei and Chan (2015), the progress in the civil sector was slow that indicates the inefficiency of various organisations.
The draft report of the organisation focuses on the rationalisation of the road user investment and charging approaches. It also recommends the best approach to be used for optimum results. The draft contemplates a process for evolvement of the approach that is cu
ently used. The cu
ent approach being used is the two-part tariff road pricing approach.
A number of works and studies that includes the Industry commission and the partnerships Australia support the findings of the organisation. The firms have been incapable of handling huge amount of funds with utmost efficiency. The cu
ent approach is unable to sustain capital with efficiency. This requires regular funding requirements across transportation networks for effective allocation of the capacity and for ensuring co
ect apportionment of costs among users of resources.
The draft published by the organisation mention a report that models the impact of price on transition to a different pricing system. The model indicates that the optimum benefits of a...