Please check the attached documents and follow the instruction. This is a four page paper. Thank you.

Topic: Compare and contrast what is a direct democracy versus representative democracy
                
Statement of Purpose
In Both Direct democracy and representative democracy, the objective is to ensure the active participation of the citizens in governance, differing in their mechanisms. In direct democracy, the citizens are involved directly in the decision-making process. Whereas, in representative democracy the elected authorities will take the decisions on behalf of the citizens. Both democracies have their advantages and disadvantages that have impact on the governance effectiveness. Hence, understanding both the history and mechanisms of both the democracies is very crucial to understand their roles in American Federal Government decision-making process.
Introduction
In the contemporary scene of American Federal Government, the talk encompassing direct vote-based system and agent a majority rules government stays relevant, especially with regards to resident commitment and administration. Direct majority rules system, following its beginnings to the popularity-based examinations of old Athens, encapsulates the immediate contribution of residents in dynamic cycles (Ober, 2015). Through components, for example, referendums and initiatives, people effectively take part in molding strategies and regulation, subsequently epitomizing the center standards of a majority rule government and cultivating a feeling of responsibility and responsibility inside the electorate.
On the other hand, agent a vote-based system, standardized in present day country states and impacted by Edification reasoning, delegates dynamic position to choose delegates (Dahl, 2017). This framework, conceived out of the need to oversee huge and different populaces, works on the rule of portrayal, wherein residents share chose authorities with advocate for their inclinations in administrative bodies. Established in electoral commands, agent a majority rules system tries to offset sovereignty with administration productivity, utilizing the skill and deliberative cycles of chosen delegates while guaranteeing that the voices of the electorate stay vital to the governance process.
Body paragraphs
Historical context
Direct democracy has its roots well established in the vote-based examinations of ancient Greece, especially in Athens, where citizens effectively took part in political dynamic through gatherings (Ober, 2008). This immediate commitment with administration established the groundwork for popularity-based standards as well as enabled residents by giving them an immediate voice in molding strategies and regulations. Ancient Greece, the authentic setting of direct majority rule government reaches out to contemporary models like the Swiss framework, described by regular mandates and drives (Wa
en, 2017). Furthermore, cu
ent signs of direct vote-based system, like drives and reviews in the US, feature the continuous significance and advancement of direct fair standards across various authentic and social settings (Smith, 2019).
Then again, delegate a majority rules system arose as a reaction to the difficulties presented by overseeing huge and different populaces. Impacted by Edification reasoning, the idea...