Solution
Dr. Saloni answered on
Apr 21 2022
3
Compare and Contrast of the Two Speakers in the Symposium
Plato's Symposium is a philosophical work that depicts a cordial duel of skilled speeches delivered by well-known personalities at an organised feast. A few of the individuals involved have been Agathon and Socrates (Boyce, 2019). This paper presents the counterarguments and arguments made by the two speakers during their addresses at the symposium. Plato's "symposium" was a convention where diverse individuals gave speeches about their perception of love, what it is, and the ways it manifests itself (Lenner, 2022). Socrates and Agathon both shared a similar perspective on love. However, they thought and articulated it in diverse ways. The party served as a framework for the day's scholars, philosophers, as well as speakers to engage and evaluate one of several subjects, in this instance, love, or eros (Sallis & Ewegen, 2021). This paper will compare and consider the two speeches (Socrates and Agathon), underlining the philosophical perspective of Socrates' speech whilst presenting Agathon's speech or argument about love as non-philosophical.
All speakers at the symposium focused on providing a comprehensive paean of Eros, which strives to confront what its beneficial and detrimental repercussions are. Socrates' comprehensive evaluation of love provides a more comprehensive insight into the subject, with every speaker criticising the preceeding speaker (Lenner, 2022). Based on Agathon's depiction of love, the speaker acknowledges the profound interconnections between beauty and love. Even though the subject is the same, Socrates emphasises averting comparisons with previous speeches and provides an opportunity to remark on his interpretation (Engler, 2022). The utilisation of answers and questions indicates philosophical concept evaluation. One of the significant commonalities between the speeches of Socrates and Agathon is that they discuss the same subject, with Socrates attempting to give his speech while criticising the previous speakers, who, in this instance, happened to be Agathon (Sermamoglou-Soulmaidi & Keeling, 2020).
One of the significant differences between these two speeches has been that both writers consider the essence of love to offer them the ideal approach to expressing it. Agathon's position is that love is the happiest thing since it is the utmost beautiful and ideal thing. To Agathon, love seems more of the god, and as such, he is the youngest of the gods in living beings (Esposito, 2020). As per Agathon's arguments, since love...