Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Assignment 1: Informed Decision-Making Assignment (40%) 1. Assignment Overview Description:At work, you need to make strategic, tactical, and operational decisions. As these decisions have direct and...

1 answer below »


Assignment 1: Informed Decision-Making Assignment (40%)




1. Assignment Overview



Description:


At work, you need to make strategic, tactical, and operational decisions. As these decisions have direct and lasting impacts on your organisation, you must be aware of distortions that may influence the quality of your decisions and use decision-making techniques such as mind-mapping, dialogue mapping, six thinking hats, and the soft system methodology, and/or employ information technologies such as big data analytics and artificial intelligence to improve decision-making processes.


In this assessment, you will produce a report explaining a decision-making process. The process can be one that you were personally involved in, or it can be described from a third-person perspective.



Word Count:2,000 words [+/-10%] excluding in-text and end-text referencing




2.Assignment Rationale


Although managers attempt to make rational and agile decisions, some unconscious distortions can influence their decisions. Explaining the decision-making process using Simon’s normative model allows you to identify the distortions and factors affecting the quality of your decisions and mitigate them by adopting effective decision-making techniques and technology.This assessment will assess your skills in critically analysing and evaluating situations and enable you to apply decision-making techniques to make quality decisions in authentic business problems.




3.Instructions


Select a decision that has been made in a complex decision-making workplace environment. This decision can either be one that you have taken part in at your workplace or one that you find from research of real-world examples.


In your analysis of your selected decision, undertake the following:



  • Describe the problem/ opportunity requiring a decision.

  • Explain the decision-making process using Simon’s normative model (intelligence, design, choice, and implementation).

  • Discuss the distortions that influenced the quality of the decision.

  • Determine the most appropriate decision-making technique and/or technology that would best mitigate the identified distortions and address the underlying causes of making low-quality decisions, in turn improving the decision-making process.

  • Describe how the selected technique/technology can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of future decision-making processes.


Suggested problem/ opportunity includes:



  1. Seeking a place to live in Perth


It is recommended for you to recall your professional experience, so that we can all learn from you!


My experience:


In December 2022, I arrived in Perth with my wife and two children to upgrade my qualifications and provide my children with the opportunity to learn about Western culture and education. Initially, we stayed with relatives. After a few months, we began searching for a house to rent for a few years. The rental market in Perth was highly competitive, and it took nearly a year to find a suitable house. Despite multiple applications through online platforms like Realestate.com.au and Domain.com.au, I faced numerous rejections due to high competition and my inability to bid higher rent. Eventually, I secured a house by offering more rent and providing all necessary documents as required by the real estate agent, Next-Move.







4.Suggested Structure


It is recommended that you use the following structure:




  1. Decision Overview



  • Provide an overview of the situation.

  • Explain the decision that was made




  1. Decision-Making Process



  • Explain the decision-making process at relevant phases.

  • It is essential to establish a clear link between the following phases. For instance, the alternatives should be evaluated in the choice phase based on the selection criteria listed in the design phase.

  • Reference is not required in this section.



2.1 Intelligence Phase



  • Explain the intelligence phase of the decision.



2.2 Design Phase



  • Explain the design phase of the decision.



2.3 Choice Phase



  • Explain the choice phase of the decision.



2.4 Implementation Phase



  • Explain the implementation phase of the decision.





Note.

Please avoid providing general information about Simon's model or defining its stages.




  1. Distortions



  • Provide at least two distortions.

  • State the distortions in a way that is consistent with their definitions.

  • References are not required in this section.




  1. Recommended Decision-Making Technique/Technology



  • A clear link between recommended decision-making techniques/ technologies and discussed distortions is required.

  • Support the recommended techniques/technologies with relevant references.





5.Assignment References


Your written work must comply with APA 7th referencing protocols including font type and size.


You are not required to limit yourselves to the contents and references provided. As long as the article is properly cited, students can use any published article as a reference.


However, among all references, you should cite at least one article from ABDC A*/A academic journals. This is to ensure that you have invested reasonable efforts in searching efforts. After the reference list, re-state the name of the ABDC A*/A academic journals which you had cited.



Note: Include page no for in-text referencing when you cite a source within the body of your text. Example: (Smith, 2020, p. 45). This will provide the specific page number(s) where the referenced information can be found.




6.Notes



  • Use appropriate, high-quality sources where relevant and apply referencing protocols correctly to all sources (there is no limit to the number of sources you can use).




Rubrics










































Criteria




Ratings




Points




Problem Situation



and Decision
￾Making Model -




25 to >20 pts High Distinction XXXXXXXXXX%)


Outstanding analysis and original (or exemplary)


conceptualisation of the problem situation. Applies


and justifies decision models with a high degree of expertise and insight.




25



pts







Distortions -




25 to >20 pts High Distinction XXXXXXXXXX%)


Key distortions and factors of decision￾quality are complete and realistic with detailed explanation




/ 25



pts




Decision-Making



Techniques -







25 to >20 pts High Distinction XXXXXXXXXX%)


Provides exceptional techniques/ technologies and


fully justified based on distortions.




25



Pts




PARTICIPATION:



Provides



sophisticated and



constructive



responses




15 to >12 pts High Distinction XXXXXXXXXX%)


Plays important role in the forums of the Discussion Board and group discussion. Responses are innovative and sophisticated. Supports or refutes the original posting with additional evidence. Respect


the views of peers by using academic and non-threatening language




/ 15



Pts




FUNCTIONAL



LANGUAGE –



WRITTEN



COMMUNICATION







5 to >4 ptsHigh Distinction XXXXXXXXXX%)


Writes fluently with virtually no errors. Referencing protocols are correctly applied to


all sources. Writes using varied and complex sentence structures. Paragraphs and overall structure are balanced, highly logical and


seamlessly linked.




/ 5 pts




Referencing follows



APA7




5 to >4 pts High Distinction XXXXXXXXXX%)


APA 7 referencing used with no errors. Weekly learning material examples and some academic


sources are incorporated clearly. Secondary sources


support and enhance the argument.




/ 5 pts





Answered 1 days After Aug 13, 2024

Solution

Dipali answered on Aug 14 2024
3 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        11
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
1. Decision Overview    4
1.1 Situation Overview    4
1.2 Decision Overview    4
2. Decision-Making Process    4
2.1 Intelligence Phase    5
2.2 Design Phase    5
2.3 Choice Phase    6
2.4 Implementation Phase    6
3. Distortions    7
3.1 Confirmation Bias    7
3.2 Anchoring Bias    8
4. Recommended Decision-Making Technique/Technology    8
4.1 Six Thinking Hats Technique    8
4.2 Big Data Analytics    10
5. Improving Future Decision-Making Processes    10
5.1 Efficiency Improvement    10
5.2 Effectiveness Improvement    11
6. Conclusion    11
References    13
1. Decision Overview
1.1 Situation Overview
For more education and better exposure to my children to western culture and education, in December 2022, I migrated to Perth with my wife and two children. On a
ival we slept with our relatives and this though affordable was not a permanent solution to the problem. With the passage of time, the issue of the accommodation’s permanency again was becoming an important one. However, as it was found out later on, the tempo of the rental market in Perth was highly saturated and therefore trying to secure a noble house was not an easy task to undertake. Several months of job hunting, several job applications and several rejections showed that such jobs were few and far between and due to rising competition, coupled with my inability to offer higher rent for properties, the market was a major hurdle. Still, the firm has been active and used other online tools such as Realestate. com. au and Domain. com. au, however, I never got a house until I tendered a higher rent than my friends and accompanied the documents that a real estate agent required.
1.2 Decision Overview
The most important choice in this case concerned the strategy of selecting a rental property in a very competitive environment. The main purpose was to select the house which would be suitable for our family and survive in such conditions of competition. In assessing and selecting various properties, evaluating the competitiveness of offer strategy and later on in selecting the strategy of increasing the rent offer form parts of the decision making process.
2. Decision-Making Process
In this section, I will analyze the decision-making process using Simon’s normative model, which includes four key phases: , Simons (1999) identified procedural justice asserting that employees desire and value intelligence, design, choice and implementation.
2.1 Intelligence Phase
The intelligence phase involved research done on the rental market in Perth and the factors that affect the supply of house and housing rents. At this stage it was possible to notice that the issue of renting the houses was a highly competitive one because there were many customer interested in the limited numbers of houses available. Some of the factors that contributed to this included population density that was occasioned by immigration into the region, lack of sufficient stocks of accommodation within the region as well as upsurge in rents.
This phase also included established the specific needs of my family including; Schools, transport and other important facilities in the community. Also, I evaluated our financial strength in order to establish our ability to afford any rent price and any other expenses that could be incu
ed in order to secure premises.
2.2 Design Phase
At the design stage it was important to come up with other strategies for acquiring a rental house. The primary alternatives considered were: The primary alternatives considered were:
· Maintaining the cu
ent approach: ca
ying on with the ritual of applying for lodging through the web with the aim of being selected one lucky day without having to offer a higher rent.
· Increasing the rent offer: Gives out a higher rent to increase chances of our application as compared with other applications.
· Exploring other housing options: Example of using other living situations, which may include moving and renting a place with other people.
In this phase, the criteria to be used to measure these alternatives were defined Though this was not a sub-phase of selection, it was closely linked with it. Such criteria were the prospects of obtaining an object, its cost, and relevance for the family’s needs and desires.
2.3 Choice Phase
The last step, the choice phase, was used to identify which out of the specific strategies defined in the design phase was suitable for the given criteria. After serious thinking it was decided to raise the rent offer slightly. This move was informed by the fact that the market was cut throat and in order to secure a chance, one had to be tough in the application process. The higher offer of rent was considered appropriate in an endeavour to achieve the main mission of getting a befitting rental house in shortest time possible. Despite, this being a financial decision, it was held that the gains for the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here