| Criteria* | HD – Outstanding Achievement 85% - 100% | DI - High Achievement 75% - 84% | CR - Above Satisfactory Achievement 65% - 74% | PS - Satisfactory Achievement 50% - 64% | FL - Unsatisfactory Achievement 0 - 49% |
| 1.Identifies and discusses the main argument, and expresses opinion on management ideas(200 words = 2)[meets subject LO2/4] | Provides analytical identification and discussion of main argument, using well considered own words. | Provides and justifies identification of main argument and discussion, using suitably selected own words. | Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of main argument, in own words. | Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of main argument mainly using own words. | Provides poor identification and discussion of main argument, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
| 2.Identifies and discusses assumptions and limitations inherent in information about management (200 words = 2) [meets subject LO1] | Provides analytical identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, using well considered own words. | Provides and justifies identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, using suitably selected own words. | Provides satisfactory identification of assumptions and limitations, and discussion in own words. | Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, using own words. | Provides poor identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
3.Identifies and discusses (using sources) research methodology and methods inherent in information about management
(150 words = 2) [meets subject LO1]
| Provides analytical identification and discussion of research methodology and methods, using well considered own words. | Provides and justifies identification and discussion of research methodology and methods, using suitably selected own words. | Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of research methodology and methods, in own words. | Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of research methodology and methods, using own words. | Provides poor identification and discussion of research methodology and methods,, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
4.Identifies and discusses findings and conclusions in research inherent in information about management
(150 words = 2) [meets subject LO1] | Provides analytical identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, using well considered own words. | Provides and justifies identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, using suitably selected own words. | Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, in own words. | Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, mainly using own words. | Provides poor identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
| 5.Identifies and discusses main ideas in article relevant to MGT XXXXXXXXXXwords = 3) [meets subject LO2] | Provides analytical identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, using well considered own words. | Provides and justifies identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, using suitably selected own words. | Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, in own words. | Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, using own words. | Provides poor identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100 expressed poorly or not in own words. |
| 6.Discusses practical applications for real life managers, their dilemmas or problems, and provides recommendations for action. (450 words = 6) [meets subject LO5] | Provides analytical discussion, using well considered own words. | Provides and justifies discussion, using suitably selected own words. | Provides satisfactory discussion, in own words. | Provides rudimentary discussion using own words. | Provides poor discussion expressed poorly or not in own words. |
7.Indicates requisite APA6th citation and referencing skills, and discusses relevancy.(up to 150 words = 2 marks)
[meets subject LO1] | 2 highly relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in perfect APA6th style.Provides analytical discussion on relevancy. | 2 very relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in near-perfect APA6th style. Provides and justifies discussion on relevancy. | 2 relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in near-perfect of APA6th referencing style. Provides satisfactory discussion on relevancy. | 2 potentially relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in near-perfect APA6th referencing style. Provides rudimentary discussion on relevancy. | |
| 8.Indicates requisite quotation skills.(up to 100 words = 1)[meets subject LO1] | Perfect quotations and citation techniques. | Very good indirect/direct quotation and citation techniques. | Above satisfactory indirect/direct quotation and citation techniques. | Satisfactory indirect/direct quotation and citation techniques. | Unsatisfactory sentences and/or poor attempt at indirect/direct citation techniques. |
| *Students must use the CSU American Psychological Association (APA6th) referencing style. Penalties may be applied for:10% over word limit / failure to cite sources / referencing errors / omissions / plagiarism (Plagiarism carries a large penalty see Handbook) |