NSG2NMR Assessment 1 Part B ruic v XXXXXXXXXXSemester 2.pdfNSG2NMR Assessment Ruic School of...

Question

NSG2NMR Assessment 1 Part B ruic v XXXXXXXXXXSemester 2.pdfNSG2NMR Assessment Ruic   School of Nursing & Midwifery XXXXXXXXXXNSG2NMR Assessment 1 Part B : Individual 1,750 Word Literature Review  MARKING SCALE Excellent (>80%) Very good (80%) Moderately good (70%) Fair (60-50%) Poor () Max Marks LITERATURE REVIEW  Review / synthesis of evidence  Key concepts/themes from the evidence have been clearly identified and described   All key concepts/themes are clearly elevant to/answer the proposed esearch question  The content is clearly structured around key concepts/themes emerging from the literature   A synthesis of the findings from the articles/studies obtained for the eview is clearly demonstrated throughout   Key concepts/themes from the evidence have been identified and described   All key concepts/themes are somewhat relevant to/answer the proposed research question  The content is structured around key concepts/themes emerging from the literature   A synthesis of the findings from the articles/studies obtained for the review is demonstrated throughout   Some key concepts/themes from the evidence have been identified but lack description and/or clarity   Some key concepts/themes are elevant to/answer the proposed esearch question  The content is somewhat structured around key concepts/themes emerging from the literature   A synthesis of the findings from the articles/studies obtained for the review is demonstrated but lack consistency   There is limited identification and description of key concepts/themes from the evidence   Key concepts/themes have limited relevance to/answer the proposed research question  There is limited structure of the content around key concepts/themes emerging from the literature   A synthesis of the findings from the articles/studies obtained for the review is demonstrated but is limited for quality and consistency   There is inadequate identification and description of key concepts/themes from the evidence   Key concepts/themes are not elevant to/ do not answer the proposed research question  There is inadequate structure of the content around key concepts/themes emerging from the literature   There is inadequate synthesis of the findings from the articles/studies obtained for the eview   35  EVIDENCE  Relevance / credibility of evidence   Pesents literature relevant to the clinical issue and research question   Content is very well supported with appropriate material from credible sources  Content is very well supported with sufficient references   Pesents literature mostly relevant to the clinical issue and research question   Content is well supported with appropriate material from credible sources  Content is well supported with sufficient references   Pesents literature somewhat elevant to the clinical issue and esearch question   Content is somewhat supported with sufficient and appropriate material from credible sources  Content is supported with sufficient references   Pesented literature is not clearly relevant to the clinical issue and research question   Content is poorly supported with eferences and/or uses non-authoritarian sources  Content is somewhat supported with sufficient references Pesented literature is not sufficiently related to address the clinical issue or research questions  Content uses non-authoritarian sources  Content is not supported with a sufficient numer of references20  IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE     Povides an excellent commentary of how well the literature addresses the research question   Identifies and describes the implication of this evidence for nursing/ midwifery practice Povides a good commentary of how well the literature addresses the research question   Identifies and provide some description of the implications of this evidence for nursing/ midwifery practice Povides comment of how well the literature addresses the esearch question   Identifies but does not describe the implications of this evidence for nursing/ midwifery practice Povides limited comment on how well the literature addresses the research question   There is limited identification and description of the implications of this evidence for nursing/ midwifery practice   A summary of how well the literature addresses the research question is omitted or lacks clarity  Identification and description of the implications of this evidence for nursing/ midwifery practice is omitted or lacks clarity   15   STRUCTURE & ORGANISATION  Well structured, with coherent and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections/paragraphs  Within the prescribed word count  Well structured, with mostly coherent and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections/paragraphs  Within the prescribed word count  Structure is coherent, with logical development of key ideas some of the time  May be inappropriately weighted within the prescribed word count  Structure may not be coherent, with logical development of key ideas  May not be within the prescribed word count  Structure lacks logical development of key ideas  Not within the prescribed word count   10  WRITTEN EXPRESSION & REFERENCING Witing was fluent and there were  minimal spelling, typing or grammatical eors   Key ideas from the literature were effectively paraphrased and cited  Coect style for citations and eference list 80%+ of the time  Witing was mostly fluent and there were few spelling, typing or grammatical eors   Key ideas from the literature were  effectively paraphrased and cited  Coect style for citations and eference list most (70%+) of the time  Witing was not always fluent and there were some spelling, typing or grammatical eors   Key ideas from the literature were not always effectively paraphrased or cited  Coect style for citations and eference list most (60%+) of the time   Witing may not be fluent and there were several spelling, typing or grammatical eors   Key ideas from the literature were not always effectively paraphrased or cited  Coect style for citations and eference list 50%+ of the time   Witing was not fluent and there were many spelling, typing or grammatical eors   Key ideas from the literature were not effectively paraphrased or cited  Incoect style for citations and eference list     20NSG2NMR Assessment Ruic  Reviewe name:    Reviewe ignae:         Total mark:  100            Assignment 1B - Suggested format .pdfNSG2NMR – Assignment 2, 2022 Assessment 1 Part B Suggested assignment formatCover page:   Include your name, your student ID, the word count, and your research question  Please include your student ID in the footer of every pageIntroduction:   Background information relevant to your topic. For example, this might include statistics on how common the problem is, a ief discussion of the implications of the problem, a short exploration of why it’s relevant to nurses/midwives  An introduction of your research question. This can be in the form of a statement, for example: This assignment will explore/discuss/evaluate/answer….  An overview of the main themes that will be discussed in your assignment  Body Paragraph 1:   This will be your first main theme. Focus either on the ‘biggest’ theme or the one that logically comes first   Use a TEEL structure to help you format your paragraph, and make sure to open with a topic sentence  Include evidence that both supports and doesn’t support your theme to demonstrate you’ve considered both sides of the issue.   Body Paragraph 2:  As above, but for your second main theme  Body Paragraph 3 (and so on, as needed):   As above, but for your third main theme  Conclusion:   Provide a discussion of  o How well the research has addressed or answered your question o What remains unclear or unknown about your

Ayan · Accepted Answer

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT		8
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Introduction	3
Background	3
Child obesity policies and programs	5
Social science contributions	6
Conclusion	8
References	10
Introduction
In Australia, childhood obesity is a pressing and significant general health issue. Indigenous children are more severely affected than non-indigenous children, and the distinction in weight status between the two groups is developing. This suggests that metabolic diseases are bound to foster right off the bat in life for indigenous children. The disparity in health status among indigenous and non-indigenous individuals is caused, to some extent, by obesity (16%). Most of this distinction might be credited to the 81% of Australian indigenous individuals that live in non-far-off areas. Obesity is caused by a mind-boggling collaboration of socio-environmental variables, some of which are well known. These causes incorporate urbanization, terrible and stuffed housing, and deficient access to health care. Furthermore, indigenous individuals specifically struggle with the loss of ancestral lands and unhealthy dietary patterns welcomed on by the frontier transition from conventional to Western diets. For the anticipation and treatment of childhood obesity in Australia, there are moderately not many government regulations and recommendations. 
Background
Except for a couple of programs, the scope and viability among indigenous children of most of Australian states and territories' initiatives to battle childhood obesity by means of healthy eating and dynamic living practices are either obscure or have not been sufficiently assessed (Howarth et al., 2022). The completion rates of programs that have assessed indigenous inclusion have frequently been lower than those for the more extensive population. Without viable indigenous government and leadership, as well as cooperative program creation for indigenous-specific obesity therapies, the issue can't be solved. Positive health outcomes are bound to be the consequence of significant interest and giving indigenous individuals influence over policies that influence their health and government assistance. Significantly, enough funding and support are necessary to advance the improvement of a labour force of indigenous health professionals who can design, coordinate, convey, and assess programs.
In Australia, childhood obesity is a severe and expanding general health issue. Roughly one in every four kids between the ages of 5 and 17 is presently overweight or obese. The way that it is dispersed unevenly is a main pressing issue. Children from indigenous communities and those who face more socioeconomic hardship have higher rates, and throughout recent years, this disparity has widened, making the most disadvantaged groups more powerless. The second-largest element (16%) in the health disparity between indigenous and non-indigenous individuals is obesity. 3 Indigenous children and adults living in non-far-off locations, which make up 81% of Australia's indigenous populace, are fundamentally responsible for this discrepancy (Deacon-Crouch, Begg & Skinner, 2020). In comparison to non-indigenous children, indigenous children show higher rates of obesity and join overweight and obesity at various ages, suggesting a more noteworthy propensity for metabolic problems right off the bat throughout everyday life. As indicated by information from the Western Australian Children's Diabetes Database, Indigenous children had a diagnostic rate for type 2 diabetes that was 18 times higher than non-indigenous children. As per a population-based companion research directed in NSW, indigenous children who were overweight or obese had a more prominent possibility of developing renal illness than non-indigenous kids. Children from indigenous and lower socioeconomic families are bound to be impacted by the intricate assortment of interrelated organic and environmental variables that contribute to the improvement of childhood obesity. Unfortunately, sustenance and health have been caused by the intergenerational social, socioeconomic, and political effects of Australia's colonization, including the constrained expulsion of indigenous individuals from their customary lands and the ensuing failure to access conventional food sources as indigenous individuals turned out to be more urbanized, had to take on a Western eating routine,

NSG2NMR Assessment 1 Part B rubric v XXXXXXXXXXSemester 2.pdf N SG2N M R Assessm ent Rubric School of N ursing & M idw ifery XXXXXXXXXXN SG 2N M R A ssessm ent 1 Part B : Individual 1,750 W ord...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment