1
Assessment Brief
TCHR3001: Early Childhood Matters
Summary
Title Assessment 2
Type Position paper
Due Date Friday, April 12th at 11:59 pm AEST/AEDT (end of Week 6)
Length 1500 words
Weighting 50%
Academic Integrity GenAI may NOT be used in this task.
Under the Rules - Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct
Rules (Section 3) students have the right to Appeal against the Academic
Integrity Officers academic misconduct Determination, to the Executive
Dean, with that determination being final and conclusive, and not subject to
further Appeal within the University. Students are not able to appeal
against academic misconduct via the Unit Assessor or unit staff.
Submission Word document submitted to Turnitin (do NOT submit PDF documents)
Unit Learning
Outcomes
This assessment task maps to the following ULOs:
ULO1: Identify a range of issues important to early childhood
education and care.
ULO2: Analyse a range of positions highlighted in authoritative
literature on contemporary issues related to early childhood
education and care.
ULO3: Critically reflect on their personal approach/philosophy of
learning, development and teaching within early childhood
education and care in relation to contemporary issues.
ULO4: Argue a position on current issues in early childhood
education and care, in relation to the literature
Rationale
As an early childhood teacher your beliefs form the basis of your early childhood philosophy. How
you implement this philosophy within your teaching practice will be influenced by a range of issues
within your local and broader community.
Task Description
This task requires you to analyse and evaluate the various positions of the contemporary issues
presented in Module 4 – 6. Include a personal reflection that explains your own position on a
selected issue and critically analyse and justify your personal position in relation to current,
scholarly literature.
Task Instructions
2
Assessment Brief
Drawing on the unit learning materials, unit tutorials and a range of relevant and current scholarly
literature, select one issue addressed in Module 4 to 6 of this unit and:
Part 1: Analyse and evaluate the positions put forward on this issue within the unit
materials and discussions. (500 words)
Part 2: Reflect on and synthesise your personal position on the issue explaining why and
how it is relevant to you personally as a teacher/educator working with children, families,
and other relevant stakeholders in the Australian early years sector (500 words).
Part 3: Justify your personal position on the issue using a range of relevant and current
scholarly literature. (500 words).
Please note:
Part 2 and Part 3 of this task can be written in first (“I” statements) or third person,
however you need to be consistent over the task in the tense and person you use.
All areas of your responses to this task need to be supported by relevant and current
literature. This means you need to cite relevant and current (within the last 10 years)
literature that supports what you are saying throughout your writing.
Please refer to your rubric for the literature that you MUST include in your responses to
each part of this task..
Please remember that you must use scholarly literature in this task.
Please refer to the following documents to support you in addressing this task:
General:
How to Incorporate Evidence into Your Writing - https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-
dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-
guides/how_to_incorporate_evidence_into_your_writing.pdf
Summarising and Paraphrasing - https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-
students/learning-zone/quick-guides/summarising_and_paraphrasing.pdf
Part 1:
You MUST refer to the unit learning materials and discussions in the recorded tutorial
session/s that address the issue you select.
Look at the meaning of ‘analyse’ and ‘evaluate’ in the following document -
https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-
guides/common_instruction_words.pdf
Part 2:
Read this document about Reflective Writing - https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-
dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-guides/reflective_writing.pdf
Part 3:
Look at the meaning of ‘justify’ in the following document -
https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-
guides/common_instruction_words.pdf
Writing Paragraphs (PEEL method) - https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-
students/learning-zone/quick-guides/writing_paragraphs.pdf
Planning and Writing Body Paragraphs (using the PEEL method) -
https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-
guides/planning_and_writing_body_paragraphs.pdf
3
Assessment Brief
Formatting and style
APA 7 formatting is required for this task.
Include a cover page that contains:
o The title of the task in bold
o Your name (as author),
o Your faculty (Faculty of Education)
o The unit code and name (TCHR3001 Early Childhood Matters)
o Your unit assessor’s name (Kelly Simpson)
o The due date
Include a title or the prompt at the start of each response.
Students may use headings that align with the task instructions to organise their responses.
Indent the first line of each new paragraph.
Use 12-point Arial font.
Double line space your writing and your reference list.
Referencing
APA Referencing style is required to be used for this task.
Include one reference list for all responses on a new page at the end of your task. Place the
title References in bold in the centre at the top of this page.
At a minimum, your sources for this task will include the EYLF (AGDE, 2022), the NQF
(ACECQA, 2023), a range of unit materials, and broader current scholarly literature.
Broader literature may include textbooks, peer reviewed articles, and published newspaper
and/or media articles by reputable sources (for example, the ABC, The Conversation, Early
Childhood Australia)
You need to include at least 8 scholarly references in your response to this task as well as the
unit learning materials and the EYLF (AGDE, 2022) and NQS, (ACECQA, 2023).
Resources
Academic Integrity - https://www.scu.edu.au/about/leadership/executive/academic-
portfolio-office-apo/academic-integrity-framework/
SCU Student Learning Zone - https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/learning-zone/
The Early Years Learning Framework - https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-
01/EYLF-2022-V2.0.pdf
National Quality Standard - https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/national-quality-standard
Guide to the National Quality Framework (including the National Quality Standards) -
https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/about/guide
Referencing Style Resource
Please refer to the APA 7th Referencing Guide for this task - https://libguides.scu.edu.au/apa
Task Submission
Your task should be submitted using the submission point in the Turnitin folder titled
Assessment 2: Position Paper in the Assessments Tasks and Submission section on the
Blackboard TCHR3001 site. Only Microsoft Word documents submitted via the Turnitin
portal on Blackboard will be accepted. You must label your final submission with your
surname and initials and the assessment task's name, e.g. SmithJ_PositionPaper.doc
4
Assessment Brief
You are strongly advised to undertake your own SIMILARITY CHECK via Turnitin, PRIOR to
the due date, to identify and resolve any academic integrity issues prior to submitting - see
SCU Academic Integrity and Turnitin. You can submit up to three times and receive the
similarity match report immediately – after three attempts, you will need to wait 24 hours.
It is YOUR responsibility to ensure that you have submitted the correct file and the FINAL
version of your assessment for marking BEFORE the due date/time.
Turnitin does not generate an automatic email receipt. If you have successfully uploaded
your assessment, a green bar will appear at the top of the screen that says: Submission
uploaded successfully: Download digital receipt. Use the hyperlink to download your digital
receipt and store this with your assignment file.
If you have any difficulty submitting your assignment, please contact Technology Services
and make sure that you log a job with them, so you have evidence of your attempted
submission. To avoid any last-minute problems, make sure you submit well before 11:59pm
on the due date.
Academic Integrity
At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty,
fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility, and respect in relation to academic work.
The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic,
and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more
information see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework
NOTE: Academic Integrity breaches include poor referencing, not identifying direct quotations
correctly, close paraphrasing, plagiarism, recycling, misrepresentation, collusion, cheating, contract
cheating, fabricating information.
GenAI May Not be Used
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, must NOT be used for this Assessment Task.
You are required to demonstrate if you have developed the unit’s skills and knowledge without the support of
GenAI. Grammarly (but NOT GrammarlyGo) may be used to review your task and make changes to grammar or
punctuation or to single words however it must NOT be used to re-write sentences or paragraphs.
Please note that GenAI tools include a range of translation tools. It is the responsibility of students to ensure
that any translation tool they are using is not a GenAI tool. Students are encouraged to write their work
without the support of translation tools for this reason.
If you use GenAI tools in your assessment task, it may result in an academic integrity breach against you as
described in the Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3.
Under the Rules - Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules (Section 3) students have the right
to Appeal against the Academic Integrity Officers academic misconduct Determination, to the Executive
Dean, with that determination being final and conclusive, and not subject to further Appeal within the
University. Students are not able to appeal against academic misconduct via the Unit Assessor or unit staff.
Special Consideration
Please refer to the Special Consideration section of Policy
https://policies.scu.edu.au/document/view-current.php?id=140
Late Submissions & Penalties
5
Assessment Brief
Please refer to the Late Submission & Penalties section of Policy
https://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00255
Grades & Feedback
Assessments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade. Grades and
feedback will be posted to the ‘Grades and Feedback’ section on the Blackboard unit site. Please
allow 7 days for marks to be posted.
Assessment Criteria
See the marking rubric for the marking criteria and grading standards.
… continued on next page….
6
Assessment Brief
Assessment Rubric
Marking
Criteria and %
allocation
High Distinction
+
100%
High Distinction
(85–99%)
Distinction
(75–84%)
Credit
(65–74%)
Pass
(50–64%) Marginal Fail
(35-49%)
Fail
(1-34%)
Not Addressed
(0%)
Criterion 1:
Part 1,
Analysis, and
evaluation of
positions put
forward in the
unit learning
and tutorials
on one issue
from Modules
4-6 is
supported with
reference to
the learning
materials and
recorded
tutorial/s. as
well as recent
scholarly
literature 15%
Achieves all the
criteria for a
high distinction
to an
exemplary
standard. Key
positions on a
chosen issue
from Modules
4-6 that were
presented in
the learning
materials and
recorded
tutorial/s are
analysed and
evaluated at an
exceptional
level with
exceptional
integration the
unit materials,
recorded
tutorials and
recent
scholarly
Key positions on
a chosen issue
from Modules 4-
6 that were
presented in the
learning
materials and
recorded
tutorial/s are
succinctly and
clearly analysed
and evaluated at
an outstanding
level with clear
integration of
the unit
materials,
recorded
tutorial/s and a
range of recent
scholarly
literature.
Key positions
on a chosen
issue from
Modules 4-6
that were
presented in
the learning
materials and
recorded
tutorial/s are
succinctly and
clearly
analysed and
evaluated at a
very good level
with clear
support from
the unit
materials,
recorded
tutorial/s and a
range of recent
scholarly
literature
Key positions
on a chosen
issue from
Modules 4-6
that were
presented in
the learning
materials and
recorded
tutorial/s are
succinctly
analysed and
evaluated at a
good level with
clear reference
to the unit
materials,
recorded
tutorial/s and a
range of recent
scholarly
literature
Key positions
on a chosen
issues from
Modules 4-6
that were
presented in
the learning
materials and
recorded
tutorial/s are
satisfactorily
analysed and
evaluated with
references to
some unit
materials,
recorded
tutorial/s and a
range of recent
scholarly
literature
evident
Key positions
on a chosen
issue from
Modules 4-6
that were
presented in
the learning
materials and
recorded
tutorial/s are
unclearly
analysed and
evaluated
and/or
discussed
rather than
analysed and
evaluated with
relevant
references to
the unit
materials
and/or
recorded
tutorial/s
and/or
Key positions
on an issue
from Modules
4-6 that were
presented in
the learning
materials and
recorded
tutorial/s is not
addressed
and/or the
analysis/
evaluation/
discussion
presented is
not relevant to
the positions
presented in
the learning
materials
and/or
tutorial/s
and/or the
references to
scholarly
literature
Not attempted
7
Assessment Brief
literature and
no errors.
reference to
scholarly
literature
and/or no
references to
the unit
materials
and/or
recorded
tutorial/s are
included in an
appropriate
analysis of an
issue from
Modules 4-6.
provided are
not relevant to
the learning in
the unit and/or
to the chosen
issue.
Criterion 2:
Part 2,
Reflection, and
personal
position on
one issue from
Modules 4-6 is
supported by
references to
the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022),
NQS (ACECQA,
2023) and 4
relevant and
current
Achieves all the
criteria a high
distinction,
with exemplary
discussion of a
personal
position on one
relevant issue
and support
drawn from
the integration
of a broad
range of
relevant and
current
scholarly
An outstanding
personal
position relevant
to an ECEC
professional on
one chosen
issue from
Modules 4 - 6 is
comprehensively
supported
through the
integration of a
range of
relevant and
current scholarly
literature and
A very good
personal
position
relevant to an
ECEC
professional on
one chosen
issue from
Modules 4 - 6
is clearly
supported
through the
integration of 4
or more
relevant and
current
A good
personal
position
relevant to an
ECEC
professional on
one chosen
issue from
Modules 4 - 6
is supported by
clear
references to 4
or more
relevant and
current
scholarly
A satisfactory
personal
position
relevant to an
ECEC
professional on
one chosen
issue from
Modules 4 - 6
is presented
with
references to 4
relevant and
current
scholarly
literature
A personal
position
relevant to an
ECEC
professional on
one chosen
issue from
Modules 4 - 6
is presented
without
references to
at least 2
relevant and
current
scholarly
literature
The personal
position
outlined does
not address an
issue from
Modules 4-6
and/or the
position
presented is
generic/not
personal
and/or
relevant to an
ECEC
professional
and/or the
Not attempted
8
Assessment Brief
scholarly
literature. 15%
literature and
no errors.
the EYLF (AGDE,
2022), NQS
(ACECQA, 2023).
scholarly
literature
sources as well
as the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022),
NQS (ACECQA,
2023).
literature
sources as well
as the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022),
NQS (ACECQA,
2023).
sources
including the
EYLF (AGDE,
2022), NQS
(ACECQA,
2023).
sources and/or
there is no
reference to
the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022),
NQS (ACECQA),
and/or the
personal
position only
generally
relates to one
issue from
Modules 4-6
and is
presented with
or without
references.
literature used
is not relevant
or is invalid.
Criterion 3:
Part 3,
Justification of
personal
position
supported by
references to
the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022),
NQS (ACECQA,
2023) and at
least 4 relevant
and current
scholarly
literature.
Achieves all the
criteria for a
high
distinction,
with
consistently
outstanding
integration of a
range of very
relevant and
current
scholarly
literature
sources and
unit learning
The justification
of the personal
positions is
excellently
linked to the
personal
position
presented and
reflects deep
engagement
with a range of
scholarly
literature with a
minimum of 4
relevant and
The
justification of
the personal
position is very
clearly linked
to the personal
position
presented and
reflects clear
engagement
with a range of
scholarly
literature with
a minimum of
4 relevant and
The
justification of
the personal
position is
clearly linked
to the personal
position
presented and
reflects good
engagement
with a range of
scholarly
literature. A
minimum of 4
relevant and
The
justification of
one personal
position is
satisfactorily
linked to the
personal
position
presented and
supported by
scholarly
literature. A
minimum of 4
relevant and
current
The
justification
presented is
only generally
linked to the
personal
position
presented
and/or a
minimum of 3
relevant and
current
scholarly
sources as well
as the EYLF
The
justification
presented is
not relevant to
the personal
positions
presented
and/or does
not include
references to
relevant
and/or valid
sources of
current
Not attempted.
9
Assessment Brief
15% materials/areas
with no errors.
current scholarly
sources as well
as the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022)
and NQS
(ACECQA, 2023)
integrated
within the
justification.
current
scholarly
sources as well
as the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022)
and NQS
(ACECQA,
2023)
integrated
within the
justification
current
scholarly
sources as well
as the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022)
and NQS
(ACECQA,
2023) provide
good support
to the
justification.
scholarly
sources as well
as the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022)
and NQS
(ACECQA,
2023) are
referenced
within the
justification.
(AGDE, 2022)
and NQS
(ACECQA,
2023) are not
referenced in
the
justification.
scholarly
literature.
Criterion 4:
Standard of
writing and
presentation –
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
paragraph
structure,
appropriate
word count,
APA 7th
referencing.
5%
Achieves all the
criteria for a
high distinction
to an
exemplary
standard,
without any
errors.
Excellent
standard of
writing and
presentation
with no errors in
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
paragraph
structure, or APA
7th referencing.
Word count
within +/- 10% of
the set word
count.
Very good
standard of
writing and
presentation
with very
minor and very
inconsistent
errors in
spelling and
punctuation
and grammar
and paragraph
structure and
APA 7th
referencing.
Word count
within +/- 10%
of the set word
count.
Good standard
of writing and
presentation
with some
minor and
inconsistent
errors in one or
two areas of
spelling or
punctuation or
grammar or
paragraph
structure, or
APA 7th
referencing.
Word count
within +/- 10%
of the set word
count.
Satisfactory
standard of
writing and
presentation
with errors in
most areas of -
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
paragraph
structure, APA
7th referencing
or consistent
errors in one or
two of the
above areas
and/or word
count
over/under +/-
Poor standard
of writing and
presentation
with consistent
errors in
most/all areas
of spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
paragraph
structure, and
APA 7th
referencing
and/or word
count
significantly
under or over
+/- 10% of the
set word count
for the task
Significant
improvement
needed in
writing and
presentation
with consistent
errors in
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
paragraph
structure, and
APA 7th
referencing
Not attempted.
10
Assessment Brief
10% of the set
word count.
11
Assessment Brief
Description of SCU Grades
High Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and
applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as
outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and
applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described
as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Credit:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying
relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Pass:
The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area.
The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Fail:
The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.