Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

1 / 1Additional Case Study: Zychol Chemicals Corporation to accompany CHAPTER 1: Operations and Productivity Bob Richards, the production manager of Zychol Chemicals, in Houston, Texas, is preparing...

1 answer below »
1 / 1
Additional Case Study: Zychol Chemicals Corporation to accompany CHAPTER 1: Operations and Productivity
Bob Richards, the production manager of Zychol Chemicals, in Houston, Texas, is preparing his quarterly report, which is to include a productivity analysis for his department. One of the inputs is production data prepared by Sharon Walford, his operations analyst. The report, which she gave him this morning, showed the following:

2008
2009
Production (units)
4,500
6,000
Raw material used (barrels of petroleum by-products)
700
900
Labor hours
22,000
28,000
Capital cost applied to the department ($)
$375,000
$620,000

Bob knew that his labor cost per hour had increased from an average of $13 per hour to an average of $14 per hour, primarily due to a move by management to become more competitive with a new company that had just opened a plant in the area. He also knew that his average cost per barrel of raw material had increased from $300 to $303. He was concerned about the accounting procedures that increased his capital cost from $375,000 to $620,000, but earlier discussions with his boss suggested that there was nothing that could be done about that allocation.
Bob wondered if his productivity had increased at all. He called Sharon into the office and conveyed the above information to her and asked her to prepare this part of the report.
Discussion Questions
Provide your answers to each question in MS Word. Attach Excel sheet to show your computation work. Organize your responses in a professional way (print out preview function in Word and Excel will help).
1. Prepare the productivity part of the report for Mr. Richards. He probably expects a multifactor analysis for both years plus the change in productivity (up or down) and the amount noted (30 points).
1) multifactor productivity in 2008?
2) multifactor productivity in 2009?
3) % change in the multifactor productivity between the two years?
4) Provide your conclusion explaining the source of the observed productivity change.

2. The producer price index (inflation) had increased from 120 to 135, and this fact seemed to indicate to Mr. Richards that his costs were too high. Using the PPI, recalculate the question above (#1). Explain the implications of this change in the producer price index (50 points).
1) Multifactor productivity for the 2009 using the given PPI?
2) % change in the multifactor productivity between the two years?
3) Provide your conclusion and compare it with your previous conclusion in #1 explaining why.

3. Management’s expectation for the departments such as Mr. Richards’s is an annual multifactor productivity increase of 5% (20 points)
1) Did he reach the goal?
2) If not, how many outputs are needed to achieve the goal?
3) What additional suggestions do you want to provide to accurately measure the productivity?


I need two files one excel and word for the answer
Answered Same Day Jan 30, 2025

Solution

Shubham answered on Jan 31 2025
3 Votes
Question 1
1. Multifactor Productivity (MFP) Calculation
Multifactor productivity is calculated as:
MFP=Output (Production Units)/Total Input Costs (Labor + Materials + Capital)
For 2008:
Production (units): 4,500
Labor cost: 22,000×13=286,000
Raw material cost: 700×300=210,000
Capital cost: $375,000
Total Input Cost: 286,000+210,000+375,000=871,000
MFP:4,500/871,000​=0.00517 units per dolla
For 2009:
Production (units): 6,000
Labor cost: 28,000×14=392,000
Raw material cost: 900×303=272,700
Capital cost: $620,000
Total Input Cost: 392,000+272,700+620,000=1,284,700
MFP:6,000/1,284,700​=0.00467 units per dolla
2. Percentage Change in Multifactor Productivity
Percentage Change = MFP (2008) – ​MFP (2009)​/MFP (2008​)​×100
= 0.00467 - 0.00517/0.00517 x100
= −0.0005​/0.00517×100
=−9.67%
3. Conclusion
The multifactor productivity is decreased by 9.67% from 2008 to 2009, despite the increase in production from 4,500 to 6,000 units. The decline is because of:
1. Increased labour cost – The labour cost per hour increased from $13 to $14 with increasing total labour expenses.
2. Higher raw material cost – The cost per ba
el of raw material rose from $300 to $303.
3. Drastic increase in capital cost – Capital allocation has been increased from $375,000 to $620,000 that contribute to higher input costs.
As the production increased, the overall cost also...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here